<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daß es Funktioniert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachmiel.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachmiel.org/blog/?p=154</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Ives</title>
		<link>http://rachmiel.org/blog/?p=154&#038;cpage=1#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Ives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachmiel.org/blog/?p=154#comment-2421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sage advice, Rachmiel.  I often suggest to my college-age poetry students that they ought, in the interest of clarifying their images, to rewrite or revise as if they their audience were a supremely intelligent ten year old - that is, intelligent enough to process the &quot;poetic argument&quot; at work in the text, but lacking in the sort of &quot;sophistication&quot; that seduces adult readers into mistaking superfluous for necessary complexity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage advice, Rachmiel.  I often suggest to my college-age poetry students that they ought, in the interest of clarifying their images, to rewrite or revise as if they their audience were a supremely intelligent ten year old &#8211; that is, intelligent enough to process the &#8220;poetic argument&#8221; at work in the text, but lacking in the sort of &#8220;sophistication&#8221; that seduces adult readers into mistaking superfluous for necessary complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
